1.
FINDING THE EXTRA DIMENSIONS

Revealing extra dimensions means using small enough "ants", in other
words particles whose wavelengths are short enough to "notice" the
extra dimensions. That means very high energies, probably even higher than the
LHC achieves. But it is possible that the LHC experiments could see some
phenomena that indirectly support the existence of these extra dimensions,
which would give string theory a major boost.

2.
LOOK BACK INTO THE BEGINNING?

When you look at stars and galaxies in the night sky you are looking back in
time. The further away an object is, the longer it has taken for its light to
reach us. The furthest back we have been able to see is to about 400 million
years after the Big Bang. This was about the time the universe had cooled
sufficiently for protons and electrons to combine to form hydrogen atoms. Even
with the biggest super-telescopes being planned, we will never be able to see
right back to the beginning of time for the simple reason that there was no
light to see until around 380,000 years after the Big Bang. This is like an
optical curtain at the edge of what cosmologists call the Dark Ages, before
which there were no stars or galaxies emitting electromagnetic radiation for us
to detect.

3.
STRINGY DARK MATTER

Another theory states that dark matter may be a higher vibration of the string
and we, for example are the lowest vibration (the lowest octave) of tiny little
rubber bands vibrating everywhere. But a string can twang and you can have
higher vibrations of a rubber band and we think that these higher octaves
(vibrations) are dark matter.

4.
PATTERNS IN THE DARK

If looked at closely a possible pattern emerges, taken into consideration that
these might just be gross approximations,

1.Having no mass, nor volume - Energy.

2.Having no mass, yet volume - Dark Energy.

3.Having mass, yet no volume - Dark Matter.

4.Having both mass, and volume - Matter.

5. EXTRA DIMENSIONAL DARK MATTER

Have
always had the intuitive feeling that dark matter, simply put, is matter from
other dimensions in hyperspace. String theory does lead credence to such claims
as it supports hyperspace and multi-dimensional particles. Sometimes I
fantasize of massive, multi-dimensional galaxies systematically interlaced in
between our 3 dimensional space. The laws of EM and optics may be closely
related to the fact as to why we can not "see" this matter. Our eyes
are the byproduct of evolution. Three dimensional matter produces three
dimensional photons aka light and our eyes were designed to see this light. As
I write this I realize it may be possible that extra dimensional matter may
create extra dimensional light.

6.
HIGGS - THE NEW ETHER

This field is made up of Higgs bosons,
which would be small particles that bind this field to matter.Sounds a lot like
ether to me. In point of fact, if you dig hard enough, it becomes quite evident
that what Higgs did was reformulate, rename, or rephrase the ether in a term
that was palatable to mainstream physicists; but make no mistake, what he is
talking about is ether, plain and simple. This Higgs boson, or binding
particle, has also been dubbed the God particle, the particle that gives matter
its mass.

7. TACHYONIC IMAGINARY NUMBER

Gamow
tells the reader that, in the 1920’s, in the process of measuring the rate of
electron spin, Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck discovered that the rate was 1.37 times
the speed of light! Paul Adrian Dirac figured out a way around the problem. As
explained by Gamow, Dirac decided to use the imaginary number

*i*, or the square root of negative one to stand for the tachyonic orthorotational speed of the electron. By using this imaginary number, relativity would not be violated. Relativity could now be combined with quantum physics.
8.
TESLA’S DYNAMIC THEORY OF GRAVITY – ANYONE ?

Sun was absorbing more energy than it was radiating.

Tesla’s dynamic theory of gravity. All matter is constantly absorbing ether all
the time at the tachyonic speed of 1.37 times the speed of light. This is the
world of ether. By its nature, the ether exists in a realm that transcends the
speed of light. Gravity is simply the absorption of ether by, for instance, the earth. The
reason we fall back to the earth when we jump up is not because of some
mysterious disconnected force called gravity; we fall back to the earth because
we are in the way of the influx of ether. That is what gravity is. It is
absorption of ether by the elementary particles. It is the elusive Higgs boson,
or God particle, the force/process that gives matter its mass. And it happens
in a continuous fashion all the time , the ground state electron is assumed to emit Larmor radiation which causes it
to spiral inward, but this does not lead to collapse of the orbit because the
electron also absorbs zero-point energy.

9. WIRELESS ELECTRICITY

tesla’s experiments – Unworkable but writable over concepts.

10. WHAT MAKES GRAVITY WEAK ?

Dimensional analysis into the revealing of the forces leaking into the other
dimensions. So that the overall effect of Gravity decreases and leads to a
inverse squared relationship . Could be explained.

11. PLACNK LENGTH - SIGNIFICANCE

The Planck area, equal to the square of the Planck length, has a clearer role
in quantum gravity. Black hole entropy is known to be given by
where A is the area of the event horizon. The action in string
theory is proportional to the area of the string worldsheet, and area is
quantized in loop quantum gravity.

The physical significance of the Planck length, if any, is not yet known.
Because the Planck length is the only length that can be formed from the
constants

*c*,*G*, and*ħ*, dimensional analysis suggests that lengths of special significance in quantum gravity are likely to be small multiples of the Planck length. In some theories or forms of quantum gravity, it is the length scale at which the structure of spacetime becomes dominated by quantum effects, giving it a discrete or foamy structure, but other theories of quantum gravity predict no such effects. If there are large extra dimensions, the measured strength of gravity may be much smaller than its true (small-scale) value. In this case the Planck length would have no physical significance, and quantum gravitational effects would appear at much larger scales.
12. GRAVITATIONAL ANALOGY

The trouble with the rubber sheet analogy is that the objects on the sheet
don't distort it by themselves. The earth's gravity pulls them down into the
sheet. Maybe an expanding balloon in space would be better. The inertia of the
objects on its surface would deform it. Maybe objects curve space because they
have inertia and the universe is expanding. This theory agrees with the
observation that the rate of expansion is increasing. If it weren't we'd have
no gravity.

13. GRAVITATIONAL SPEED = C

Is equal to the speed of light that means it must be composed of photon like
particles. that left aside when an object does explode does the effect travel
of light travel faster or does the gravitational force travel faster.. It would
then make sense that effects of gravity

*only*translate through spacetime at c, hence C is the maximum speed*to*which gravity can accelerate any object.
14. ZERO POINT ENERGY DEVICE(quantum perpetual motion machine)

A thought experiment for a device that readily
demonstrates how the Casimir force could be put to use in principle was
proposed by physicist Robert Forward in 1984. A ''vacuum
fluctuation battery'' could be constructed consisting of stacked conducting
plates. Applying the same polarity charge to all the plates would yield a repulsive
force between plates, thereby opposing the Casimir force which is acting to
push the plates together. Adjusting the electrostatic force so as to permit the
Casimir force to dominate will result in adding energy to the electric field
between the plates, thereby converting zero-point energy to electric energy.

One can imagine an even
simpler microdevice in which the Casimir force pushes two plates together
thereby engaging some kind of lever which does work. There is no practical
application in these examples since ideally it would take just as much energy,
and in practice somewhat more energy owing to frictional and other losses, to
separate the plates for a second cycle. Nevertheless, this would demonstrate
the concept of conversion of zero-point energy in principle if the Casimir
effect attribution to zero-point energy is correct (which is debatable).

This is owing to the circumstance that the zero-point energy
density is assumed to be constant: no matter how much the universe expands it
does not become diluted, but instead more zero-point energy is assumed to be
created out of nothing.

15. WHY THEORIZE ?

On
the other hand don't think that "spin 2" etc will explain much
because gravitons are attempts to explain a mathematical result as a physical entity.
Sometimes such explanations seem to "explain" things, most of the
time we have more math than fits our universe. In other words, even Einstein
had some difficulty deciding which mathematical formulation for general
relativity would be best to use...he had several and had to discard
most......it was the "equivalence principle" which led him to be able
to guess which one might match experimental results. "spin two" was
an "accidental" discovery hiding within string theory when it was
discovered.

Nobody even knows if gravitons exist, and if they do, where they came from,
where they are going, and whether they might survive a grand unification theory
(combining quantum mechanics and general relativity). All particles and energy
may result from spontaneous symmetry breaking; that's the best theory we seem
to have currently. But in fact nobody knows for sure what any particle
"is" (Exactly what is an "electron" for instance) maybe a
"string"?? Maybe a probability wave function) , nor what time, space,
and gravity actually are. What we do have are some neat theories that make
predictions and to the extent we can test them experimentally seem to work
pretty well.

It's good to keep in mind things (the world around us) are very deceiving: are
you the "same" person you were a year or two ago?? Not really, just
about every cell in your body has been replaced!!! Our five senses are
narrowband filters that keep out 99.9% of what is around us so we are easily
mislead. Somehow, though, our brain has developed beyond our meager senses. So
we are able contemplate "gravitons" even though we cannot sense them.

16. EM SPECTRUM’S EXTENSIONS

The
long wavelength limit is the size of the universe itself, while it is thought
that the short wavelength limit is in the vicinity of the Planck length,
although in principle the spectrum is infinite and continuous.

17. DISTURBING THOUGHTS

Oscillating universe theory

Q: 1 So if the universe keeps oscillating like bang-crunch-bang again. What
could the purpose be?

Ans: to find as many possibilities for the created to find out about The
creator . Its the ultimate satisfaction a creator can get. when his creations
are able to figure out and understand the creator himself . Maybe thats the ultimate
purpose of the created. to figure out who's the creator.

Q: 2 If we are created by chances
, was it to enjoy life as a gift and be done with it and thats all ?

or has it been given to seek the ultimate truth ? is there an ultimate truth.

Or is like the lies we use when we need to please someone ?

Possible Ans : If everything is an accident, there's no reason to figure
anything out. If everything is futile, purpose is an imaginary concept. But if
everything was created, and if everything has a purpose, shouldn't it be the
underlying goal of all mankind to discover that Creator and find that purpose? And so we endeavor to discover our Creator and fulfill our purpose, while using
science as merely one of our tools. So we should include the speculation that God may have created everything for a
purpose and that perhaps the universe we see is evidence for God.

18. MATHEMATICS OF LOGIC.

a.) Gödel's first incompleteness
theorem states that: Any effectively generated theory capable of
expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In
particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic
arithmetic truths, there is an arithmetical statement that is true, but not provable in the theory

b.) Gödel's
second incompleteness theorem can be stated as follows:

For any formal effectively generated theory

*T*including basic arithmetical truths and also certain truths about formal provability,*T*includes a statement of its own consistency if and only if*T*is inconsistent.